Reading Guide for Topic 2A
I think we will not actually start Topic 2A until next Thursday. I already assigned the Hindiusm portion to Topic 1A. I should not have done that. I have included the Hinduism part here, so if you haven't read it, you should do so. I have also included the Buddhism part. There are also some problems with how Murphey talks about religions and I have discussed those here as well.
Topic 2A
Textbook
Hinduism
Pages 21-25
What is the relationship between dharma and caste/jati/duty?
What is the relationship between kharma and reincarnation?
How is karma used to explain/justify caste/jati distinctions?
How has Hinduism changed over the centuries? What were the causes of these changes?
Murphey tries to separate Hindu religion from Indian culture when talking about caste/jasti. Do you think his is correct in making this separation?
What is Murphey’s attitude towards Hinduism?
Problems
There are several here. One of the big ones is on page 22. Murphey emphasizes “ahisma” (non-violence) in Indian tradition and is critical of violent aspects. However, we saw violence in the early Vedas. These Vedas are considered “shruti” and so I think it is difficult to downplay the violent aspect too much. It should be remembered that Indra used violence to protect weak priests and to punish sin, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing!
Buddhism
25-30
How did social and political factors contribute to the beginning of Buddhism?
How did Buddhism reject hierarchy and caste distinctions? How did it maintain them?
How and why did Prince Siddartha (personal name Gautama) begin his journey that transformed him into the Buddha (enlightened one)/Sakyamuni?
What are the Four Noble truths?
What happened to Buddhism in India and why?
What is Theravada/Hinayana Buddhism? What countries was it transmitted to?What is meant by “merit”?
What is Mahayana Buddhism? What countries was it transmitted to?
What are bodhisattvas?
What is the tension between existence in this world and seeking release from this world in Buddhism?
How does Murphey see Mahayana Buddhism is departing from early/original Buddhism? How might Mahayana Buddhists disagree with Murphey?
Problems
On page 26, Murphey writes “(Buddhism) rejected the folk panoply of Hindu gods but reaffirmed Hinduism’s basic monotheism, its nonpersonalized worship of the infinite and the great chain of being.”? This is highly problematic. The vast majority of Buddhists are not monotheists. In addition, I’m not sure if we can speak of worship in Buddhism in the same way as we do in other religions. It means something else.
On page 27, Murphey states that Buddhists following the sermon on the Four Noble truths could “achieve blissful reabsorption of their souls into the spiritual infinite, as the Buddha did on his death.” This is one school of thought. Others took it to mean annihilation. The other big problem is that traditionally Buddhism has not taught the existence of self/soul (atman) but rather has taught that self/soul does not exist (anatman). We will talk about this in lecture. You will also see it discussed in the sourcebook.
On page 28, and 29-30 Murphey talks about Buddhists “worshipping” relics (he also says some Christians do). I don’t think the respect Buddhists (or Christians) pay to relics could properly be called worship.
Murphey follows a kind of “decline” theory of Buddhism and Christianity. That is, he sees Buddhism and Christianity as being pure in their earliest forms and then declining and moving away from these forms over time. I think this is problematic. Christians and Buddhists typically see themselves as following the traditions their respective founders established. Even when there are changes, these are often understood as positive development, not negative decline.
A final major problem is what is missing. There is no section focusing only on Christianity in Asia. There are ancient Christian communities that have been around for a long time in Asia. For example, the Catholic and Orthodox communities have been in existence longer than some of their European counterparts.
Sourcebook, Chapter 2: India
India
The Upanishads
The permanent soul
Is the soul being spoken of an individual soul or another kind of soul?
What does it mean that “this Soul” holds everything together? What does that say about the relationship amongst the things that are held together?
The meaning of “aum” (om)How does the importance of this syllable relate to the duties of the priests?
In the last line, what is meant by “He who knows this, with his self enters the Self”?
Buddhism
Impermanence and renunciation
Under what conditions was the Buddha raised?What does he mean by being “beyond disease” (or old age)?
The first sermon
What is the Middle Way?
What causes pain/suffering and how do we free ourselves from it?
In the last two paragraphs, what is it that finally brings enlightenment?
The doctrine of non-soul, anatman
How does this challenge what we think about “I”?
Why are monks to loath “the body”, “feeling” and “perception”?
The ‘great liberation’: the death of the Buddha
What is meant by “exoteric” and “esoteric”?
What is meant by “be lamps unto yourselves”?
What is meant by “Decay is inherent in all component things”? How does this relate to the “doctrine of non-soul, anatman”?
A nun’s poem
Why did the author of this poem become a nun?
Dharma (this reading, and I think the ones following it have to do with Hinduism)
The four stages of life and renunciation
Why would a priest have four different stages of life? How does this relate to the priest’s dharma?
The duties of a woman?
How would you summarize the duties of women?
It appears that girls married very young? Why would they do so?
Why are people allowed to steal from a Shudra?
Eight kinds of marriage
What benefits do the first four types of marriage bring? What does this say about the individual and his or her relation to family?
Sexual error
What sorts of sexual errors are there?
